Film Assignment Essay

For this assignment, I chose the 1996 movie A Time to Kill is applying Carl Rogers representative of Argument. The necessitate is based on the overbold of the equal title by john Grisham that tells the story of finding unspoiledice amidst the racial bigotry of the South. It is the story about a black man, Carl lee(prenominal) Hailey, who killed the men who dishonor and mauled his 10-year old daughter Tonya and is feel at a death sentence should he be found guilty of death penalty in courtyard in a town where racial prejudice continues to abound.It is done the efforts of his defense lawyer, Jake Brigance that Carl Lee was acquitted and released (McConnnaghuey and capital of Mississippi 1996). At first glance, a public debate is very likely to ensue. Some would regularize Carl Lee is guilty because he stone-broke the law by murdering the suspects. The last mentioned had been arrested and should involve been given their daylight in court and let the law take its course . They see that revenge was Carl Lees motivating for taking matters in his own custody and that the death penalty is appropriate because of what he did, consistent to the adage, the punishment must go away the crime. Legally, Carl Lee is indeed guilty and the gore appears to be leaning towards that decision. However, looking at it from the other side, there ar others, as personified by Jake, who believe Carl Lee did the mighty thing though it was very drastic. duration it may be true that Carl Lee was legally guilty, this does non immediately signify he is morally wrong. In the latter part of the film, Jake won the case because he was able to find common cornerstone, not only with the jury, but too to the audience.He took their attention away from Carl Lee and his serve and instead focused it somewhere else on the actual victim Tonya. Jake did this by taking everyone on a travel privileged Carl Lees mind, putting themselves in his place, retracing his road to perditi on on the day his daughter came to him battered and bleeding to the prison term he killed the suspects. He closed the journey by telling the jury to instantaneously imagine she were white. This is the common ground Jake successfully pass oned. The secret behind it was Jake is able to pick out the jury shed off some(prenominal) racial bias they may cook by getting them to empathize with Carl Lee. The forget was instead of looking at a black man seeking right for the attack on his daughter, but just a father who is merely looking out for his daughter. It can be inferred that everyone on the jury would have done the same thing if the victim had been their own child.They also know how biased the justice establishment is in town and that black masses never get a medium trial but in this case, Jake succeeded in making them see it from a opposite perspective. It is certain that everyone knows justice is not ever so found in the courtroom, especially in this town and there are times when doing the right thing means suspension the law because the law is not correct as it is administered by a racially prejudiced society. What was substituted here is a deeper reek of justice that is common to all, rooted in religious beliefs.In other words, sight like Carl Lee are direct by their personal morals that are very fundamental where it becomes easy to discern right from wrong. All in all, the film shows a demonstration on how the Rogerian position is applied as common ground was established with the audience by the performers in the film through the use of empathy to establish this common ground. Bibliography A Time to Kill. tell by Joel Schumacher. Performed by Matthew McConnnaghuey and Samuel L. Jackson. 1996.