Jury Nullification :: Jury Jurors Court Justice System Essays

Jury NullificationJury nullification means that a jury finds a defendant innocent because the law itself is partial, or is unjust in a particular application, and so should not be applied. So re on the wholey what this means is that no mater what the law says the jury leave alone pretty much surrender the right to take aim weather the soul is going to be guilty or innocent and that is kind of ok in some cases but then again its not in others so we should not expect our juries to test our laws only the case that somebody is being tried in and they should only judge that person on all of the facts given. Amendment VIThis is the sixth amendment and this tells you about what juries can do in cases of law. In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an sincere jury of the State and territory wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation to be confronted with the witnesses against him to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense. What all of this means is that everyone that gets convicted of a crime gets all of the same benefits weather its a misdemeanor, felony, or capital crime. Everyone get the rights to a speedy trial and an impartial jury.Some of the people in the world always ask themselves this move when in the court room WHY DID OUR FOUNDING FATHERS EXPECT CITIZEN JURIES TO stress OUR LAWS AS WELL AS THE GUILT OF THE INDIVIDUAL ? Well the termination is really simple its Because If a juror accepts as the law that which the judge states then that juror has accepted the exercise of absolute authority of a government employee and has surrendered a power and right that once was the citizens safeguard of liberty. (1788) (2 Elliots Debates, 94, Bancroft, narrative of the Constitution, 267) Jury nullification of law, as it is sometimes called, is a tralatitious American right defended by the Founding Fathers. Those Patriots intended the jury service of process as one of the tests a law must pass sooner it assumes enough popular authority to be enforced. Thus the Constitution provides five dollar bill separate tribunals with veto power -- representatives, senate, executive, judges and jury -- that each delineation of law must pass before it gains the authority to punish those who choose to violate it.