Descartes Third Meditation :: essays research papers

Meditation IIIIn Descartes Third Meditation, he establishes arguments to constitute the existence of God. Descartes believes in Cogito Ergo Sum this means I think therefore I am. The I in this sentence means the soul. Descartes believes the existence of the opinion is better known than the existence of the body. If my soul thinks then I exist. The Cogito proves the existence of self or the mind this is not the same for the theory of God. Descartes has two arguments in the Third meditation. The arguments are the cause of his idea of God and the cause of his existence now.In the third meditation Descartes uses his existence as an example to find let on whether God exist. Descartes explanation is whatever he perceived clear and distinct is true. The idea of the existence of God could have been caused by something out side of himself. Something had to regularise the idea of God in his mind for him to think about the existence of God. Descartes says, I must examine whether there is a God, and, if there is, whether he send packing be a deceiver. Descartes has to prove that God exists and that he is no deceiver. Descartes then explains that the idea of God is the idea of a perfect or Supreme Being. A perfect being could have set this idea in our minds. He discovers that a perfect thing exists and that perfect being is defined as God. Descartes says, on the whole these attributes are such that, the more carefully I concentrate on them, the less possible it seems that they could have originated from me alone. So from what has been said it must be cogitate that God necessarily exists. Descartes also reveals that God is not a deceiver. Descartes knows that a perfect being has no faults. Deception depends on some defect or fault. Therefore, if a perfect being has no faults then that perfect being can not be a deceiver.